The invasion has begun: 'Independence Day'
arrives to lead the assault of science-fiction
movies, TV shows and books on the cultural
mainstream. (Cover Story) Richard Corliss.
Abstract: 'Independence Day' (ID4) is the most
spectacular of over a dozen science- fiction film for
summer 1996, along with at least as many current or
planned sci-fi TV shows. While ID4 may be 1950s paranoia
with 1990s special effects, other shows explore
psychology, humor and cynicism about government secrecy.
Full Text: COPYRIGHT Time Inc. 1996
Pick a house, any average American house, and chances are
the folks inside will be fans of science fiction. This
pretty house in Washington, for example. The family has
just had the cable Sci-Fi Channel installed. Mom has been
known to try to commune with a dead woman who once lived
there. And Dad? He just saw the new alien-invasion epic
Independence Day--at home. Dean Devlin, the co-writer and
producer, watched Dad watch the film, and Devlin was
impressed: "He was whipping off facts about history,
talking about social and international issues. But when
the movie started, he pulled out a big old bucket of
popcorn, kicked back, and he was Bubba again."
Bubba lives in the White House, the house that is zapped
into holocaustal flames by a flying saucer's death ray in
Independence Day. The house that, come Christmas, will be
invaded by uggy green creatures with no manners at all in
Tim Burton's Mars Attacks! The house whose primary
resident supposedly knows every secret of a secretive
government--the hot dish about alien sightings, alien
abductees, alien autopsies--except that, as viewers of TV
shows like The X-Files are taught, the President doesn't
know the half of it, because the information is kept from
him by conspiratorial feds who may be, God help us,
aliens themselves!
By summer's end, the only creatures on Earth to feel
alien will be those who haven't seen ID4. (O.K., the
abbreviation makes no sense, and what will they call the
sequel, ID5?) The most smartly hyped film of the summer,
it is also the grandest: Devlin and Roland Emmerich, the
director and co-author, dare to imagine the ultimate
catastrophe as it kills off tens of millions of unseen
victims and ennobles a dozen major characters, from the
Commander in Chief to a stripper's pet dog.
This is a busy summer for the paranormal: The Arrival
sent Charlie Sheen off to battle aliens (involved in a,
yes, government conspiracy), and this week, in
Phenomenon, John Travolta undergoes a mysterious hoisting
of his IQ and psychic powers. The season has already been
a sweltering one for blockbusters: Twister has earned
more than $215 million at the U.S. box office, Mission
Impossible more than $160 million. But ID4, with heroic
humankind battling an army of soulless space lizards, may
well be the biggest. Says Steven Spielberg, who evoked
the wonder of interplanetary communication in Close
Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the
Extra-Terrestrial: "I could never make an evil,
aggressive alien movie, but I would sure pay to see one.
I'll pay to see this one. Based on the way I think people
feel today, I believe Independence Day will be the No. 1
film of the year. It will do between $250 million and
$300 million, if not more."
ID4 is a vigorous, retro-'70s disaster movie, reminiscent
of Airport or The Towering Inferno. Only this time the
disaster is the end of the world. On July 2 in a near
future year, humongous spaceships enter the Earth's
atmosphere, hover over major cities around the globe,
then send out a heat ray that pulverizes every urban
center. Washington, New York, Los Angeles, Paris,
Moscow--all barbecued. On July 3 the U.S. President (Bill
Pullman) plots his counterattack with the aid of a
computer genius (Jeff Goldblum), an Air Force pilot (Will
Smith) and all their surviving relatives. By July 4, ID4
has soared into flyboy heaven for the climactic dogfight
between Us and the Evil Other. You saw the movie's
trailer--didn't it promise you fireworks? All right, ID4
delivers.
"Our movie is pretty obvious," Devlin admits. "The
closest we get to a social statement is to play upon the
idea that as we approach the millennium, and we're no
longer worried about a nuclear threat, the question is,
Will there be an apocalypse, and if so, how will it
come?" In ID4, it comes to us. Once man, and movies,
dreamed of conquering space; then we got to the moon and
woke up. Now sci-fi films are passive-aggressive: we wait
for the spacemen to drop by. And if the visitors are
hostile, we go nuclear on their ass.
Brisk and churning, ID4 offers no grand vision, other
than the fact that, in this post-cold war era, it looks
to outer space to find new enemies worth hating, fighting
and blasting into little squishy pieces. "The U.S. is
desperately in search of an enemy," says Paul Verhoeven,
who has directed some stunning sci-fi (RoboCop, Total
Recall) and the equally otherworldly Showgirls. "The
communists were the enemy, and the Nazis before them, but
now that wonderful enemy everyone can fight has been
lost. Alien sci-fi films give us a terrifying enemy
that's politically correct. They're bad. They're evil.
And they're not even human."
Like most sci-fi movies, ID4 is a sensation machine. You
leave saying "Wow!" instead of a speculative "Hmmm."
These days the real head scratchers are on TV; there
you'll find the genre's cool, metallic intellect touched
by the fever of despair. The X-Files' twin mantras--"The
truth is out there" and "Trust no one"--are the ideal
ingredients for a sci-fi cocktail with a '90s twist. The
paranormal and the paranoiac have joined hands through a
pop-cultural wormhole; they meet and multiply. It's not
so much science as psychic or psychoanalytic fiction.
Psy-fi.
And the phenomenon is here to stay, for a while.
Hollywood is launching more than a dozen science-fiction
movies within the next year or so. Besides Mars Attacks!
(a gleefully nihilistic vaudeville that promises to play
Dr. Strangelove to ID4's relatively docudramatic
Fail-Safe) and the inevitable sequels and remakes of
Alien, Star Trek: The Next Generation and Lost in Space,
you'll see big-budget versions of thoughtful sci-fi
novels: Carl Sagan's Contact (directed by Robert
Zemeckis), Michael Crichton's Sphere (Barry Levinson) and
Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers (Paul Verhoeven).
The airwaves and cable wires already pulse with a dozen
TV series on the otherworldly, from the light-headed NBC
hit 3rd Rock from the Sun to the time-travel capering of
Sliders on Fox, from Showtime's The Outer Limits and
Poltergeist: The Legacy to the fact-based (or factoidal)
Unsolved Mysteries and Sightings. Two of the series, The
Sentinel on UPN and Fox's new Millennium, from The
X-Files creator Chris Carter, are psychic cop shows. The
media sky is darker with eerie phenomena than a
UFOlogist's nightscape. As a serial killer whispers in
the first episode of Millennium (the creepiest TV
premiere since Twin Peaks), "You can't stop it!"
In some of these shows, such as the proliferating Star
Trek spin-offs, the aliens are benign, intellectually
curious--like American mid-century liberals, only with
pointy ears or exposed frontal lobes. The Zeitgeistiest
programs, however, tap into a pop persecution mania.
Consider this: the U.S. stands unchallenged as a world
power, is not at war, enjoys a high standard of living
and has relatively stable rates of interest and
unemployment; yet polls continue to show a profound
malaise. People feel crushed by government, abused by
corporate employers, baffled by computers. "Technology is
moving fast-forward," says Carter, "and we rarely get a
chance to understand the implications. Most of us can't
program our VCR. We have the tools of science in our
hands, and we're afraid of them."
Today, the American theology of the '50s--the middle
class's belief in the government's bland benevolence--is
a dying creed. Rising expectations have given way to
escalating suspicions about those in power. It isn't only
the Montana Freemen who believe that we have met the
enemy and he is U.S. "We know we've been lied to," says
Bryce Zabel, Dark Skies' co-creator, "about Vietnam,
Watergate, Iran-contra." Moreover, as ID4's Emmerich
notes, "every generation creates its own mythology. Now
the mythology centers on the government's hiding the dead
alien bodies it discovered at Roswell."
Ah, Roswell. This New Mexico town is the Lourdes of
psy-fi, just as Area 51, the supersecret facility in
Nevada, is its Vatican. The story goes like this: in July
1947, flying saucers crashed near Roswell, and dead
creatures and their spacecraft were taken into government
custody; for a half-century, alien remains have been
studied in Area 51. Officially, the place barely exists,
but it and Roswell have entered the pop lexicon. Area 51
appeared in the second episode of The X-Files; it is the
setting for much of Independence Day. In the hit movie
The Rock, the FBI director says that Sean Connery knows
about "the alien landing at Roswell." Dark Skies posits
that the government suppressed news of the Roswell aliens
and that the space demons have taken over America by
implanting infant aliens in people's brains--a scenario
for people who think Oliver Stone's conspiracy theories
are way too timid.
Area 51 must be a busy place; everyone has a theory about
what's inside. Aliens. Abductees. Elvis. "I think what's
hidden in Area 51 is Kyle MacLachlan's career,
particularly after Showgirls," suggests comedian Kevin
Murphy, the voice of the robot Tom Servo on Mystery
Science Theater 3000, which last week found a new home on
the Sci-Fi Channel. "Or how about this? All those socks
from all those dryers get sucked through your dryer vents
into a porthole, and they end up in Area 51. The
government scrapes some of your DNA off the socks to get
a genetic encoding. It then puts it into a huge computer
so that it always knows what you are doing." Murphy takes
a breath. "Of course, I might be just a little paranoid."
Paranoia could be the only sane strategy for getting
through the '90s. When sci-fi solon William Gibson is
asked if his fiction is an optimistic or pessimistic view
of the future, he replies, "A realistic view of the
present. I don't think of myself as a futurist. I think
of myself as someone who inhabits a baffling and in many
ways terrifying present in 1996. Science fiction is
always about the year in which it is written. Invasion of
the Body Snatchers is a McCarthyite fantasy. Today, I
think, the alien is inside, a virus of one kind or
another." He cites J.G. Ballard's remark: "The only truly
alien planet is Earth."
The idea that sci-fi is not so much a window to the stars
as a mirror of our dark selves is supported by David
Hartwell, an editor at Tor Books. "The alien represents
metaphorically what's in the real world. The aliens in
'50s films often represented communists--faceless
invaders who were going to take over our country. The
mysterious beings of 2001: A Space Odyssey in 1968
represent our transcendent future. Independence Day
sounds like the old form of sci-fi: the foreign invaders
intend to wipe out our cultural heritage--ethnic
cleansing. They don't want to come in and settle. They
want to take over."
If we are now painting the Other as bad guys in black
spaceships, what does it mean? Clive Barker, the author
(Sacrament) and filmmaker (Hellraiser), thinks the
attitude is dangerously alienating. "It disconnects us
from being able to operate in the real world," he says.
"There's a sense we're unplugging from political
activity, civic duties or even responsibility to our
neighbors by saying there are things greater than us and
secrets hidden from us. We are a superstitious species,
and we need to look outside ourselves for something
larger that will bring either calamity or wisdom or maybe
both. This is about belief, not just box office."
It may be about belief. It is certainly about box office.
Peter Chernin, the 20th Century Fox chairman, didn't see
a holy white light when he gave the green light to ID4;
he was thinking grosses. Michael Sullivan of UPN didn't
have religion in mind when he put four sci-fi shows on
his network; he was thinking demographics. "Sci-fi has
traditionally been a cult item, and 20 years ago,
networks had to draw a mass audience. Now with the
networks' share of audience diminishing, that core
audience becomes more significant," he says. And NBC's
Warren Littlefield was not looking for metaphors when he
programmed an entire Saturday evening of fall shows with
spooky themes. He was listening to the voice of his
11-year-old son, to whom the fantastic is as real as it
is to Gibson. "I can't get him to watch a classic western
on television," Littlefield says and repeats this recent
conversation. Son: "So let me get this straight. The
horse doesn't fly?" Father: "No, it just rides across the
desert." Son: "I'm outta here."
It's the TV producer's job to keep kids and adults glued
to the screen. As The X-Files' Carter easily admits, "Our
goal, first and foremost, is to scare people." It's the
modern movie director's job to package an old idea with
zippy effects so that the audience will think it's seeing
something new--and be blown away. During the cold war,
even the cheesiest sci-fi filmmaker, like the legendarily
dyscompetent Ed Wood, had some moral admonition in mind
("He tampered in God's domain"). Now it's size that
counts; sense and scruples don't. As Spielberg says, "If
the '70s and '80s were the era of the What if? movie,
then the '90s are the era of the What the heck! movie. We
say, 'Hey, this is so beyond our logical grasp, so out of
this world, that we're just going along for the ride.'"
Emmerich, 40, the conductor of ID4's wild ride, is a
can-do scholar of Hollywood moviemaking; he has built a
reputation for efficient melodramas on modest budgets.
(For all its locations and effects and the mandatory cast
of thousands, ID4 reportedly cost a thrifty $71 million.)
Emmerich first fell under the spell of science fiction as
a boy watching U.S. films as well as local sci-fi TV
shows in his native Germany. "For me," he says, "going on
a science-fiction movie set is like visiting toyland. You
see, my brother trashed all my toys when I was a kid.
It's very Freudian. For my movies you can blame my
brother Andy."
Emmerich made his early films in Germany--and in English,
for the world market. In 1989, after a clever
Spielberg-rip-off kids' fantasy (Making Contact) and a
comedy about moviemaking (Ghost Chase), he directed Moon
44, an outer-space Dirty Dozen with a story line that
would recur in ID4: for a desperate space battle, a
former combat pilot must assemble a ragtag band of
flyers, including a loser with heroically suicidal
tendencies. Devlin played the computer-nerdy male
ingenue; after Moon 44, he and the director became
filmmaking partners.
Their first U.S. project was Universal Soldier, a hearty
exercise in RoboCop sadomachismo that starred Jean-Claude
Van Damme. Then, in 1994 Emmerich and Devlin did
Stargate, about a secret government agency detecting
signs of extraterrestrial life and discovering that the
pyramids were made by aliens. With Kurt Russell as the
director's standard rogue grunt, the film was a surprise
hit.
These films were routine but easy to take; they put the
fun in perfunctory. ID4 is a big step up, a doomsday
fable told at warp speed. The approach of the alien ships
is nicely achieved, with ominous shadows creeping across
the Apollo 11 monument on the moon, then up the facades
of the White House and the Empire State Building. On
Earth, an ensemble cast fleshes out the stereotypes
(Harvey Fierstein, whiny gay man; Judd Hirsch, crusty old
Jew; Vivica Fox, stripper with heart of gold), while the
three male leads mine all available righteousness and
comic charm. Wryness is a big tactic here; it keeps the
story from going ballistic. In the late 1990s, you will
learn, there is apparently a 24-hour McLaughlin Group
channel. There's also a near monopoly of Fox and Star TV
news networks. The networks are owned by Rupert Murdoch's
News Corp., which just happens to have financed ID4.
The film has a salutary scope and bustle and enough kick
in the fireball special effects to make audiences
cheer--sure, it's the end of the world, but you can still
party like it's 1999. As Will Smith says, "You can sell
an alien attack better than the old days when you could
see the zipper on the back of the alien's costume."
Minute by minute, though, things look mighty familiar. If
Forrest Gump was Everyman, ID4 is Everymovie, a browse
through the whole film catalog: The Day the Earth Stood
Still, Strangelove, Close Encounters, Alien, Top Gun,
2001, Apollo 13.
Devlin, 33, comes from a movie family (his father is a
producer; his actress mother appeared in a '60s Star Trek
episode, "Wolf in the Fold," as a princess killed by the
spirit of Jack the Ripper); adapting Fred Allen's famous
jape about television, he says, "Imitation is the
sincerest form of Hollywood." He knows that movies are to
steal from. "More than any other genre," Devlin says,
"science fiction cannot deny what comes before it. So,
when we did a science-fiction film, especially one like
this, where we wanted to have fun, we said, 'Let's
out-and-out pay tribute wherever we can to movies that
came before us.'"
Nothing seems so anachronistically delightful as an old
movie that takes place in the future. Whatever dire thing
people predicted was going to happen didn't. ID4, set in
the near future, has that same comforting feeling. It's
deja new. And if the picture gives us familiar thrills
instead of the paranormal creeps, just wait. Ambitious
writers and directors all over Hollywood are busily
devising aliens whose evil is bounded only by their
creators' imaginations. As Zemeckis says, "We can make
them into what we want them to be, whether it's angry and
vengeful or benevolent and healing."
Moviemakers don't need to conquer the aliens. They
control the screen. And when they do it well, they
control us, as cunningly as an ID4 alien running a mind
scan on a puny Earthling. Only after the lights come up
can we shake off the fear, say, "It's only a movie," and
steal an anxious glance at the night sky.
Back to ID4 Reviews
Introduction to Cultural Studies Homepage
Schedule of Readings
Jane Kuenz's Homepage
English Department Main Index