Sep 2006
Ramblin NYC Blues
09/30/2006 08:53 AM
|
It's not about the money
09/28/2006 02:05 PM
This little gem comes from my USM theory colleague
Alan Kaschub. When his class of freshman
theoreticians were feeling down about things, perhaps
questioning the long, trying life in music that lay
ahead of them, he gave them these encouraging words:
You know those students in other disciplines who party all the time, never have class on Friday or even Thursday afternoon, who drink constantly on the weekend, sleep all day Monday, and maybe stumble in hungover for a late Tuesday class as the cycle begins again? They're gonna make more money than you.
Coming Soon to a Presbyterian Church near you
09/25/2006 11:07 PM
Been too long since I've attempted the
shameless self promotion in this space. (Okay, not
really - maybe a day?) But this concert is just
around the bend and I'm pretty pumped about it. And
if you happen to be around NYC on Columbus Day
Weekend, why not come by? More info, you say? Click
here.
Clanging Around
09/24/2006 09:54 PM
The Art of Beth Wiemann
09/23/2006 01:40 PM
Beth Wiemann, who I met at at
the Virginia Center of the Creative Arts, came
to USM at my invitation to give a workshop and a
performance yesterday. What a great pair of
events. Beth is clarinet and composition faculty
at the University of Maine (formerly known as
the University of Maine at Orono), and her work
involves combining electronic sound, video, and
live performance. Her compositions are deeply
narrative, often deriving their influence from
literary sources, and dreamlike in their overall
effect. One piece, Dodge at Mann Gulch, recounts
the story of a Montana wildfire in 1949. Wagner
Dodge led a team of smoke jumpers who attempted
to do battle with the blaze, but almost
immediately realized they were outmatched. With
no way to outrun the fire, Wag Dodge, as he was
known, created an "escape fire," which worked
to deter the approaching inferno and secure his
escape. He was unsuccessful in getting his
charges to adopt the seemingly insane plan,
however, and many of them were lost. Wiemann
tells the tale with beautiful imagery, pensive
clarinet rumbles, and text from Norman MacLean's
account of the event, Young Men and
Fire. The end product is haunting. But my
favorite piece was "For He is Good to Think on,"
written for flute, clarinet and DVD. Beth was
joined on stage by flautist Liz Downing in
playing a simple yet mesmerizing, almost-folk
like score that coincided with processed videos
of Beth and her husband's (composer David
Rakowsky) two cats and percussive and sitar-like
electronics. Tying the work together is the very
wonderful poem "For I Will Consider My Cat
Jeoffrey" by Christopher Smart (also used by
Britten in his "Rejoice in the Lamb"). The piece
had that quality, shared by only the best
time-based works of art, of making you wish it
would last forever. I just let the sounds and
words and images wash over me - a perfect
confluence of sensory stimulation.
We had a pretty nice turnout at both the workshop - where Beth displayed some of her techniques and software - and the concert, where the classical reviewer from the Portland Press Herald also turned up. We'll see what he had to say, but all and all I'm glad to have gotten the USM concert season off to a start with some 21st century music (something that's sometimes in too short supply around here.)
We had a pretty nice turnout at both the workshop - where Beth displayed some of her techniques and software - and the concert, where the classical reviewer from the Portland Press Herald also turned up. We'll see what he had to say, but all and all I'm glad to have gotten the USM concert season off to a start with some 21st century music (something that's sometimes in too short supply around here.)
The Tom Manning Controversy
09/21/2006 09:59 PM
There's a brief background, anyway. You can read about it until you're blue in the face by googling any of the buzz words in that there first paragraph. A lot of ink's been spilled, but I've been meaning to comment about it here for a few days and so here I go. It should be clear that my views are mine alone, and do not represent those of the University that so graciously hosts this website and pays my salary. As it turns out, however, I agree with the University's decision and here's why. Mr. Manning's art, while charming and competent in an undergraduate sort of way, is by no means startlingly original or accomplished, either in content or in technique. His paintings depict political prisoners, children killed by police, iconic revolutionaries such as Fidel Castro and Che Gueverra, and also, of course, Tom Manning. And because the art is not transcendent, it never rises to the level of being about itself, and is instead more about its creator and the context of its creation. Now there are those that might claim that no art ever truly transcends its context, but I think we could all agree that there are at least degrees of context transcendence (compare, say, Beethoven's Seventh to a Bumble Bee tuna jingle). It's that partial or total transcendence that makes Beethoven or Dahl's boorishness, or Wagner's anti-semitism irrelevant. The works take on a life of their own, like children, and the authorial umbilical cord is severed, leaving the entities at either end to fend for themselves in the world. Tom Manning's art will never be about art, and it will always be about Tom Manning. It will not have a life of its own in art history texts or in the collections of connoisseurs, although it may be a footnote to someone's historical text. And by choosing to portray in paint revolutionaries and victims, some of whom could be considered political prisoners, alongside himself, Manning's ultimate goal cannot be understood otherwise than as an attempt to rehabilitate his own legacy. The exhibit was, in short, self-serving for Manning and his supporters - a chance for Manning to place himself, in every viewer's consciousness, alongside the great men and women in whose shadows Manning would walk. He certainly has a right to express himself in this way, and good for him that he's honing his painting skills, but he has no more right to a university art show, as a convicted felon and amateur artist, than he has to host his own public radio show proclaiming his innocence and wholesomeness. His show was a post-facto bid for exculpation, and nothing more. If the art were spectacular - if there were some chance for the discussion to ever be at least in part about the art and not wholly about the man - I would have a different opinion. If Manning were a creator in the unique realm of, say, a Darger, the controversy would ultimately one day fade, but the art would remain. Here, the opposite is true. Great art, born of any circumstance and wrought by any hand, demands to be reckoned with. But in the absence of greatness, political art becomes just politics, and not every candidate is entitled to a forum.
I have thus far studiously avoided passing judgment on Manning's criminal actions. Of course that's not really for me to do - he was convicted in a court, not for crimes of thought or political activity, but for murder. And no matter how noble his cause, and how evil the corporations or governments he protested, I don't support the "by any means necessary" mentality that justifies violence against innocents in the name of justice. I applaud the art gallery's willingness to address controversial issues, and hope that this experience won't put an end to that tendency. But I also applaud the administration's decision to revoke what turned out to be more a soapbox than an exhibition.
What Happened to Springer?
09/19/2006 10:05 PM
I like Air America Radio, and yes, because basically
when they preach to the converted they're preaching
to me. I like Al Franken's biting wit and generally
moderate stance on things, and I like Randi Rhodes'
more radical and ranting approach. But over the last
year and a half or so I've grown particularly fond of
Jerry Springer. It's odd, given his television show,
that he would emerge as the most reasonable of radio
talk show hosts, but that's exactly who he is. Not a
particularly great debater, or blessed with an
acerbic wit or incontestable command of the facts,
Jerry's great asset is that he really listens, and he
is actually capable of entering into a dialogue with
his callers. He seeks out alternative perspectives,
even conservative ones, and treats people with
respect. He'll change his mind on the air, and he has
a completely endearing kind of self-deprecating
humor. He's a mensch, basically, and I like having
him on in the car or if I'm having a late run around
the bay. (He's also a Yankee fan.) So imagine my
surprise when yesterday I tune in the radio and
Springer on the Radio is completely gone - wiped
clean from the face of the earth. It seems to have
been replaced by a show hosted by Sam Seder, a guy
with a typically caustic and abrasive radio voice
who's always indignant, and always right. And yet on
Air America's website there's no mention of the
change. None of the local affiliates indicate that
anything is different. I called 870 the Voice here in
Portland and they didn't return my call. Are we just
not supposed to notice? Isn't it a bit inappropriate
for a radio station that's been carping - and rightly
so - about the current administration's obsessive
secrecy and totalitarian tendencies to be so
non-forthcoming? Truth be told, they actually did
this when they put Jerry Springer on the radio too.
There used to be a show hosted by Liz Winstead and
Rachel Madow, and I seem to recall I was equally
alarmed at Air America's technique when they made
that shift too. Please people, give me some advance
notice. Or mention it on the web. Something. Don't
just try to rewrite history like in some Milan
Kundera novel, you know?
Not only Higgins Beach
09/17/2006 10:56 PM
Yeah, I'll admit it looks
like a pretty enjoyable mid-September Sunday in
Maine. But lest you think this was even a
majority portion of my day, I'll give you the
whole agenda, in retrospect.
6:30am - get up, turn off cell phone alarm (forgot to deactivate)
8:30am - saunter out of bed, super decadently, check email and surf a bit (the web, that is)
9:30-10:30am - run - my usual route, 5.5 miles including the back cove and poopy factory
11:15am - out to Wild Oats and Hannaford for the week's grocery shopping
12:30pm - Lunch with Al - tomatoes, mozzarella, basil, olive oil - can you say Italian holdover?
1:30-3:20pm - Grading theory and counterpoint papers
3:20-4pm - prepare bulgar salad for evening picnic, also skewer shrimp that Alex had marinating...
4:15pm - leave house with Alex for Higgins Beach, where I've not yet been this summer
4:40pm - Arrive at the beach and park illegally. The surfers are out in abundance and I feel like a child with my boogie board. The water is cool, but entirely tolerable, and the waves are enormous and crashing. I boogie board for about half an hour and am in paradise, my earthly troubles melted away.
5:20pm - Leave for Two Lights State Park.
5:30pm - Get to the park - the sign says they close at 6:30pm, so this barbecue better be quick. Al and I work fast, find a choice table, and grill away. I wish I could say it was entirely relaxing, but with the time pressure, not so much. We have corn and veggie burgers and shrimp and green peppers, and my bulgar, tomato, feta and basel salad (w/ lemon and olive oil dressing).
7pm - Stop off at Videoport to return videos and pick up The Sound of Music, which I'll use in Music Appreciation tomorrow night.
7:20pm - unpack, clean up.
8-9:30pm - Work on revising the libretto to the second act of my opera.
9:30pm-10:30pm - Send school-related emails
10:44pm - Think about the three classes I'm teaching tomorrow.
11pm - Blog
11:15 pm (forthcoming) go to bed.
So now you know.
Oh and P.S. - The Sea Dogs won it all today! I'll blog about the parade, if there is one.
Game 4
09/16/2006 09:53 PM
SeaDogs Fever!
09/15/2006 10:25 PM

When it comes right
down to it, Portland is a minor league town.
Tonight, the day of game 3 of the Eastern League
Championship, a day on which the local Portland
Seadogs (who I try to forget is the double AA
farm team for the Red Sox) had a chance to win
their first ever Eastern League pennant, Alex
and I sauntered up to the box office at game
time, and for $8 each bought two second-row box
seats behind the visitors' dugout. It was a near
sell-out, so I'm not quite sure how we worked
that out, but the ticket man said our timing was
excellent. The game itself was pure delight. We
were surrounded by kids, and I even sat next to
probably the only other Yankee fan in the whole
building (who proudly wore a Seadogs cap).
Initially I felt some guilt about rooting for
Red Sox affiliated ballplayers, but by the
second half of the game I was completely drawn
in, and it was a great game indeed. These double
A players aren't nearly as perfect as their
major league counterparts. Errors abound, which
gives the game a wonderful unpredictability.
There's also such a wholesome vibe to the whole
affair, and you don't feel like you're being
robbed and raped each trip to the concession
stand (a local microbrew cost $4.50). In the
bottom of the ninth, the Seadogs were down 6-4,
one out, and Luis Jiminez, their bopper, strode
to the plate with two men on. He jacked a 94
mile per hour fastball deep into the heart of
the Portland night, and we all gasped
collectively and grabbed the arms of our
neighbors. Dead center field, it hung in the air
forever, and the centerfielder backpedaled and
made what, at the time, seemed a futile last
ditch leap, his back to the wall. And somehow,
he came down with the ball, and the air sizzled
right out of the 6,500 or so wide-eyed fanatics
in the stands. So close to a walk-off,
championship-winning tater, but just another
long out. And Alex, in her newly purchased
Seadogs sweatshirt, was forced to acknowledge
that yes, there are aspects of this game -
particularly during playoff time - that simply
can't be touched by any other sport. So now I
think I have to go back tomorrow night...I've
got the fever.
A Hoax!
09/13/2006 08:42 AM
Turns out Lonelygirl is most definitely a hoax! Yay
for them - had me fooled. I feel in no way
betrayed.
Just another picture
09/12/2006 10:30 PM
Weekend wandering
09/10/2006 09:09 PM
Lonelygirl Revisited
09/07/2006 10:41 PM
Can you believe the word on the street now is that
Lonelygirl15 is a fraud? A hoax, that is. I mean,
she's clearly a 16 or 17 or 18 year old girl, so I
don't think people think that part's fake, but the
whole off-the-cuff spontaneous home-editing thing and
the slowly emerging love story between Daniel and
Bree - most people, including The New York Times, think
it's not real, but rather the scripted
deviousness of some corporate slime waiting to
drop the boom. I really don't follow the
argument, or know what that boom might be, but
it's delightful to watch it all unfold. Here's
the latest:
Ostia by day and by night
09/06/2006 11:16 PM

It looks
better than it was. I mean, actually, it was
pretty okay. This was a portion, or rather two
portions, but two SMALL portions, of the journey
home. We sat on the American Airlines plane for
4 hours after an aborted attempt at takeoff.
Then they canceled the flight, and we waited for
two more hours at the baggage claim, and then
for yet another hour outside in the hot
Fiumicino sun for the busses. The buses took us
out of the airport, and to the town of Ostia,
which I think nobody realized was a seaside
resort with astounding ruins to boot (we passed
them on the bus). So at 7 and at 10 I swam in
the sea, and there was gelato, and I hooked up
with a group of Americans heading back from
Positano and we went out dancing and drinking.
Back to the hotel at 2, and up for the next
round of buses and plains at 5am. And then the
endless trek to Portland continued, those little
glimmers of sun and moonlight fading into
memory. And from the vantage of the first day of
classes, which is now similarly fading, I have
to wonder if it was all just a woozy jetlagged
dream.
Jetlag
09/05/2006 09:16 PM
Sorry for silence
09/05/2006 09:06 AM
Somehow my password got messed up and I wasn't able
to post to the blog. This prompted me to stop
blogging entirely for a little while, but you can go
back and review some of the final posts I made in
Italy and the adventure of my lost luggage. My flight
home was an even bigger adventure (44 hours), but
I'll have to go into that a little later.
È Arrivata!
09/01/2006 11:17 AM
Train to Malpensa
09/01/2006 09:03 AM
