USM Social Dashboard »

Check out our new Social Dashboard to see other ways to stay connected across the USM community.

Report

Older Adults and Adults With Disabilities: Population and Service Use Trends in Maine, 2012 Edition. Chartbook.

Abstract: 

This Chartbook is an update to the Chartbook: Older Adults and Adults with Physical Disabilities: Population and Service Use Trends in Maine 2010. With the aging of Maine’s population and its status as the “oldest” state in the nation, the use of long term services continues to be a critical public policy issue in the State and nationally. The information in this Chartbook is provided to help inform state policy makers, legislators, providers, advocates and others with an interest in this subject.

Outline of the Chartbook:

  • Sections 1-4 of this Chartbook provide general demographic information on historical and projected change in the population of older adults in Maine, by county and compared with other states. These sections also provide an overview of the number of older adults who live in poverty, have a disability and live in rural areas.
  • Sections 5 and 6 provide comparisons of the characteristics of people who live in nursing facilities, residential care facilities and at home.
  • Sections 7-10 examine the trends in the use and “case mix” of people in nursing facilities and residential care facilities.
  • Section 11 provides an overview of the supply of nursing and residential care facilities and beds.
  • Section 12 includes a summary of selected quality indicators across long term care settings.
  • Section 13 provides a comparison of the use of services across long term care settings and
  • Section 14 provides comparative expenditure data.

When referencing or using any of the charts or other materials in the Chartbook, please use the following recommended citation:

Fralich, J. et al., Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities: Population and Service Use Trends in Maine, 2012 Edition. (Chartbook). Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; 2012. Available at: http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/Adults-Disabilities-Maine-Se...

Publish Date: 
12-30-2012
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/Adults-Disabilities-Maine-Service-Use-Trends-chartbook-2012.pdf

Members Dually Eligible for MaineCare and Medicare Benefits: MaineCare and Medicare Expenditures and Utilization, State Fiscal Year 2010. Chartbook.

Abstract: 

This report is one of a series of reports prepared by the USM Muskie School on MaineCare members who are dually eligible for MaineCare and Medicare Services.  This first report provides a high level overview of the MaineCare and Medicare use and expenditure patterns for all members who were dually eligible in state fiscal years (SFY) 2008-2010.  This report provides baseline data on the characteristics of Medicare-MaineCare members who are dually eligible, the distribution of expenditures across categories of service for MaineCare and Medicare, and the cost of care for people with select chronic conditions. The report includes information on members considered full benefit as well as those who are partial benefit members.  Partial benefit members are also know as Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries, Specified Low Income Medicare Beneficiaries; Qualified Individuals; and Qualified Disabled and Working Individuals.  Individuals who are dually eligible for MaineCare and Medicare typically have multiple chronic conditions, high medical and long term care costs, and low income. Medicare covers hospital, medical, skilled long term care and pharmacy services while Medicaid pays for behavioral health, community based long term services and supports and nursing home services. The integration of services and benefits for people who are dually eligible is a challenge for states and the federal government. As states move to introduce value based purchasing initiatives through health homes, accountable care communities and other managed care efforts, the need to coordinate services and align incentives between the Medicaid and Medicare programs becomes increasingly critical. Many states are involved in dual eligible demonstrations to improve the integration of services, benefits and care.

Suggested Citation: McGuire C, Gressani T, Bratesman S, Fralich J, Griffin E.  Members Dually Eligible for MaineCare and Medicare Benefits: MaineCare and Medicare Expenditures and Utilization, State Fiscal Year 2010. (Chartbook).  Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; October 2012.


Publish Date: 
10-30-2012
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/MaineCare-Medicare-benefit-analysis-SFY2010.pdf

Maine's Community Living Program: Implementation and Outcomes

Abstract: 

Over the last five years, options counseling has evolved from a general set of activities and functions within Area Agencies on Aging and Aging & Disability Resource Centers (AAAs/ADRCs) to a more standardized and generally accepted role within the Aging Network. With the award of the Community Living Program (CLP) grant in 2009, Maine proposed to develop more consistent methods for identifying people at risk of residential facility placement and to begin to develop standards for the options counseling functions. In 2010, Maine was also awarded an Options Counseling Standards Grant which has provided support for furthering the work started under the CLP grant.

Muskie School staff developed a Consumer Satisfaction Survey, A Survey of Options Counselors and Options Counselor Manager/Supervisor Survey. Results of the surveys and data from the follow-up form developed by the Steering Committee are included in the Outcomes section of this report. Muskie staff also conducted the evaluation of Maine's Options Counseling Standards Grant. The results of this evaluation are organized into two main sections: Implementation of Options Counseling which examines the processes, protocols and practices that were developed , and Outcomes which examines the implementation of the options counseling services along four dimensions:

  • Consumer Outcomes;
  • Staff Outcomes;
  • Organizational Outcomes; and
  • System Outcomes.

Suggested citation:

Fralich J, Richards M, Olsen L. Maine's Community Living Program: Implementation and Outcomes. Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; December 2011.

Publish Date: 
12-30-2011
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/Maine-Community-Living-Program-Implementation-Outcomes.pdf

"Homelike" Characteristics of Maine's Residential Services: A Survey of Maine's Residential Service Settings (2010). Chartbook.

Abstract: 

To better understand the nature of the residential facilities serving more than 19 percent of Maine’s Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS) population, the Maine Department of Health and Human Services commissioned the Muskie School to conduct a survey of residential facilities as part of its update to Maine’s LTSS profile. The goal of the Maine Residential Settings Characteristics Survey, conducted between July and September 2010, was to measure the "homelike" characteristics of residential settings.

The survey sample comprised a total of 636 facilities which included all licensed residential care facilities or private non-medical licensed institutions. The survey response rate was 82.9%, and survey questions collected information about the facilities' physical characteristics and features, services, resident characteristics, and policies relating to autonomy and privacy.

Suggested citation:

Fralich J, McGuire C, Griffin E. "Homelike" Characteristics of Maine's Residential Services: A Survey of Maine's Residential Service Settings (2010). (Chartbook).  Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; November 2012.

Publish Date: 
11-01-2012
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/ME-Residential-Facilities-Survey.pdf

Satisfaction Survey Results and Lessons Learned: Maine's Aging & Disability Resource Center (ADRC) Project

Abstract: 

The primary goal of Maine’s Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) Project was to empower consumers to make informed decisions about long-term services and supports and to streamline access to existing services and supports through an integrated system. With funding from the Administration on Aging to strengthen and expand the number of Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs) in the state, all five of the Area Agencies on Aging were committed to becoming and/or strengthening their capacity to be fully functioning ADRCs.

This report provides a summary of the results of consumer satisfaction surveys that were conducted for three years at all five ADRCs. The survey was designed to capture the consumer view of the ADRC services in key domain areas including: visibility/trust; efficiency; responsiveness and effectiveness. Also included is a summary of consumer comments that were shared by those responding to the survey and a summary of lessons learned from the administrators at the ADRCs. Significant accomplishments of the ADRCs were reported as training; providing information, resources, navigation assistance and options counseling to a broad spectrum of aging and disabled adults, along with their caregivers; the ability to expand the ARDC's role into the disability community; and the connection with community providers. Challenges reported included the lack of resources and inability of the State Unit on Aging to be approved to apply for future funding; ongoing operations and expansion as a a fully functioning ADRC without the funding to support the additional work, and the need for updated on-line referral database and the staffing to maintain it.

Suggested citation:

Fralich J, Olsen L, Richards M, Bowe, T.  Satisfaction Survey Results and Lessons Learned: Maine's Aging & Disability Resource Center (ADRC) Project. Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; December 2012.

Publish Date: 
12-01-2012
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/ADRC-Survey-2012.pdf

Maine Direct Service Workforce Survey Results of 2012: A Chartbook

Abstract: 

Direct service workers play a central role in the quality of the long-term services and supports provided to older people and people with disabilities in home and community settings. Nationally, and at the state level, there is a critical need for more information about this workforce in order to inform workforce policy and measure improvements in workforce quality and stability over time. Maine was one of seven states to administer baseline surveys under a grant funded by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service. Survey questions focused on workforce volume, stability, and compensation, as well as, cultural competence, workforce challenges, workforce training and worker qualifications.

This Chartbook provides the results of two direct service workforce surveys conducted in the summer of 2012: one for Personal Attendants who work for adults with disabilities and families in participant-directed programs; and the second for Provider Organizations serving adults with intellectual disabilities and older adults with disabilities.

Key Findings from the Personal Attendant Survey:

  • 51% of direct service workers employed as personal attendants in Maine’s participant-directed programs have an annual household income of less than $22,000.
  • 37% have no source of health-insurance and another 28% are insured under MaineCare.
  • The majority of personal attendants became a personal attendant because a friend or family member needed care (69%). Many also value the personal satisfaction (59%) and flexible schedule (52%) that this work offers. 
  • Most personal attendants express a high level of satisfaction with their work.
  • Personal attendants are less satisfied with their wages.

Key Findings from the from the Provider Organizations:

  • 91% serve people with developmental disabilities, intellectual disabilities, or autism, while 55% serve persons with mental health or psychiatric conditions and 47% serve persons 65 years or older adults and 45% serve people with physical disabilities.
  • Two-thirds of the Direct Service Workers employed by Provider Organizations work 36 or more hours per week.
  • An average of 89 workers per Provider Organization work primarily in residential settings; an average of 29 workers per Provider Organization provided primarily in-home supports.
  • At the same time, the Provider Organizations served fewer people in residential settings than in home settings, with an average of 42 persons receiving residential services and 50 persons receiving in-home supports per Provider Organization. Provider Organizations tended to serve more people in day programs or with rehabilitative or medical supports.
  • Two-thirds of a Provider Organization’s Direct Service Workforce has had more than 12 months of continuous paid employment.
  • Workers providing day program and other community support services tended to be paid more than workers providing job or vocational services, residential services, or in-home supports.
  • 39% of Provider Organizations pay 76% or more of the health insurance premium for their Direct Service Workers.
  • 92% of Provider Organizations offer vacation or paid time off to their full time workers.
  • Provider Organizations were more likely to identify finding qualified workers as a workforce challenge, with worker turnover the second most frequently identified challenge.

Suggested Citation: Westcott D, Griffin E, Fralich J. Maine Direct Service Workforce Survey Results of 2012. (Chartbook).  Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; November 2012.

Publish Date: 
11-30-2012
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/DA/ME-Direct-Service-Workforce-Survey-2012.pdf

2012 Maine Juvenile Justice Data Book

Publish Date: 
10-24-2012
Author: 
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/justiceresearch/datacenter_juvenile.html

2011 Maine Crime Victimization Study

Publish Date: 
10-06-2011
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/justiceresearch/Publications/Adult/ME_Crime_Victimization_Survey_2011.pdf

Recidivism Rates of Youth Discharged from Supervision 2006 - 2009

Publish Date: 
01-15-2012
Author: 
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/justiceresearch/Whats_New.html

Recidivism Rates of Committed Youth, 2006 - 2009

Publish Date: 
05-01-2012
Author: 
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/justiceresearch/Whats_New.html
Syndicate content