University of Southern Maine

 

Professional Staff Senate

 

Meeting Minutes from

Wednesday, November 5, 2003

2-4pm  11 Baxter Blvd, Portland Campus

 

 

I.                    Attendance: meeting called to order at 2:12pm by Senate Chair Robin Day

Present: Sharon Bannon, Donna Bird, Sondra Bogdonoff, Joy Britting, Norma Charette, Robin Day, Kat Schorr, Dana Gray, Anita Higgins, Sheera LaBelle, Pat Marston, Mark Menezes, Kathleen Pease, Rebecca Warinsky.

 

Excused: Joyce Lapping, Pamela Roy

 

Absent: Casandra Fitzherbert, Thomas Wood

 

Guest: Susie Bock, Head of Special Collection at the Glickman Library

 

II.                 Acceptance of the October 1, 2003 minutes

Minutes were accepted with the following changes:

·         Beth Shorr’s name has been corrected.

·         David Nutty’s name has been corrected.

·         Changed “Agenda” to “Minutes” in title line.

·         From this point forth all acronyms will be spelled out at least once in minutes.

 

III.               President’s Office Report (Reported by Robin Day in Beth Shorr’s absence.)

URIC group continues to look for feedback. Senators Gray, Higgins, and members of the Business and Executive Committees were invited to attend a briefing/feedback session offered by the University of Maine System BOT in conjunction with the Cambridge Concord Associates consulting firm. The BOT has approved a study of the University of Maine system infrastructure.  Other invitees to the session were the Executive Committees of the Student, Faculty and Classified Senates.

 

IV.              Executive Committee

a.       Updates from the Senate Chair

Senator Rebecca Hodges has left the University, therefore leaving a vacant position of Co-Secretary in the Senate.

 

b.       Treasurer’s Report

The Senate budget is currently $900.00. The Inter-departmental transfer (IDT) of $250 to support the Employee Development Day has been processed.

 

c.       Election of new Co-Secretary

Kat Schorr (formerly Kat Gowen) volunteered to fill this position. Robin Day motioned to elect Senator Schorr as the new Co-secretary and Senator Gray seconded the motion. The vote was held and all approved. Kat Schorr commenced to take down the minutes for this meeting.

 

V.                 Committee Reports/Updates

a.       Elections Committee

The Senate has lost 5 Senators since the beginning of this year’s session, 4 of whom left USM. We currently have 2 vacancies: an At-Large Seat, previously held by Rebecca Hodges and a Divisional seat, previously held by Julie Archibald. The next person we have on the list of individuals who ran for an At-Large seat and were not elected is Sara Treible from Resident Life. We currently do not have any other individuals that ran for a Divisional seat and were not elected. We discussed the three possible options:

1.       We can declare that the open Divisional seat is now an At-large seat.

2.       We can leave the seat vacant until new elections in February.

3.       We can solicit volunteers to fill the seat for a term ending in May 2004.

Senator Bird motioned to declare the Divisional seat to become an At-Large seat so we may contact the next potential individual not elected, and if a response is not confirmed by the February meeting, a formal call for nominations will be made. Senator Gray seconded the motion. All voted and the motion was unanimously approved.

 

b.       Bylaws Committee (no report)

We discussed clarifying members of the Senate Committees versus the Senate representatives on USM-wide committees. This issue will be examined at their next meeting, after Thanksgiving break.

 

c.       Communications Committee

Due to the loss of the previous Co-Secretary, we need to collect Senator bios again. Senators should send their bios for the website to Senator Menezes as soon as possible. There will be updates made to the website as soon as possible.

 

d.       Space Planning Committee

Senator Gray reported that the committee is examining the issues surrounding signage for “out” buildings. These buildings are defined as small buildings that USM purchases to use for offices, etc. The Committee is also discussing departmental, window and vehicles signage. They also reviewed the findings from the walk-through of Bailey Hall.

 

e.       Parking Committee

Robin Day summarized the minutes from the September 19, 2003 USM Parking/Transportation Review Committee meeting.  Submitted by Jane Coolidge, Professional representative.

 

f.        Other Committees

University Business Process Improvement Committee (UBPIC), a sub-committee of the University Review Improvement Committee (URIC): Senator Higgins reported regarding the questions that have been sent out to all staff. The Chair must get the answers by Friday, November 7th. Senator Bannon showed interest in participating in this Committee.

 

Lewiston-Auburn College (LAC) Wellness Adhoc Committee: Senator Marston reported that Suzanne Roy has created  a Wellness Committee on each campus to deal with these issues; therefore, this Adhoc committee has been disbanded. Dan Philbrick is chair of the new LAC Wellness Committee. Senator is no longer on part of this particular committee because she does not work at the LAC campus.

 

Employee Development Advisory Committee: Senator Charette reported on the Employee Development Day, particularly on the guest speaker Lou McNally, which was not well received. She did, however, report that the workshops were great. There was approximately 85 people in attendance.

  

VI.              Senate Reports

a.       Classified Staff

Senator Pease reported on the November open general meeting.

 

b.       Faculty (no report)

 

c.       Student

Student Senate Chair, Jeremy Collette reported that the senate discussed the possibility of electing a student body president. They also examined the current committee structures and discussed re-focusing some, and disbanding others. They discussed the possibility of raising the student activity fee, but no numbers have been formalized.

 

VIII.         Guest Presenter Susie Bock, Head of Special Collections, Director of the Sampson Center

Susie Bock began by giving us the background of the Sampson Center. It was established around 1997-1998 to create and develop a collection of documents for several diversity-centered groups. The collection includes manuscripts, rare books, and also includes “new” or “young” pieces. The Special Collections Unit is currently creating its governance structure. Presenter Bock summarized the main points in the draft of this structure for the Senate. There will be a Steering Committee of 10-12 people who will meet four times a year, and two standing sub-committees: the programming and the fundraising committee. The Steering Committee will take part in the long term planning, work on developing policies and procedures, promote fundraising, advocate for the Center, create outreach and collaborative work, and review new additions to the collection.

 

Presenter Bock also explained that the Sampson Center is looking for an appointment from the Professional Staff Senate to the Steering Committee. The appointee does not need to be a Senator. Presenter Bock agreed that she would provide the Senate with a list of names of potential individuals that might wish to be appointed to the Committee. We will review this listing, and also add any names we wish. The appointment would begin at the beginning of next year (September 2004) and last for two years.

 

The make-up of the Steering Committee is to be as follows:

      3 faculty scholars

      1 Professional Staff

      2 USM Students

      1 Classified Staff

      Director (Susie Bock)

      Director of Libraries (David Nutty)

 

Senator Day asked Presenter Bock what kind of criteria or qualifications should the Senate look for in the appointees? Bock responded that the appointee should be interested in the values of diversity at USM.

 

The Senate agreed to take part in the appointing of a Professional Staff representative. The Senate will place the call for nominations on the ProSen website and send out an email to all Professional staff. We will ask the nominees to write a few sentences about why they want to be part of this Steering Committee to help us make a decision.

 

Presenter Bock agreed to send us the formal governance of the Steering Committee as soon as it is approved. Then, the Senate will collect and review nominations in December, and make a decision.

 

The Senate thanked Susie Bock for coming to share this information with us.

IX.               Open Forum

Senator Gray started the conversation by stating that he not only likes reporting to the Senate what his committees are doing, but also to report to the committees how the Senate feels about the issues at hand.

 

Senator Bannon said that committee members need to let the Senate know how it can be helpful.

 

Senator Bagdonoff stated that she joined the Senate to have her voice heard. She would like the Senate to play a more active role in decision-making, not just hearing/relaying reports. Senator LaBelle stated that she joined the Senate to help make a difference.

 

Senator Day asked if time limits should be set for reports to allow for broader discussion opportunities.

 

Senator Bogdonoff suggested that the Senate change its agenda, and have reports at the end of the meeting, giving more time to discussion items. Senator Menezes agreed.

 

Senator Day stated that the Senate normally move priority items to the top of the agenda for discussion/feedback. She asked if the Senate would like more presentations/guest speakers to let us know what is going on? She also suggests that this topic be added to the next meeting agenda.

 

Senator Bogdonoff suggested that we identify our concerns and create a list of people to invite to speak.

 

Senator Bannon asked what impact would the Senate have if we did try to address our concerns. Senator Day pointed out that bringing in speakers would give the Senate a chance to voice it’s concerns to the appropriate people and make sure that our voice is heard.

 

Senator Day asked senate members to review the bylaws prior to the next meeting so that all senators understand the senates stated goals and mission and to allow for a more focused discussion.

 

Senator Marston suggested that the Senate look at the Senate goals and choose one to be our focus for the year.

 

We briefly discussed suggestions regarding cutting $550,000.00 from the budget.

 

X.                 Old Business (no report)

XI.               Ajourn: meeting adjourned at 4:00pm by Senate Chair Robin Day.

 

Next meeting is Wednesday, December 3, 2003 in 301 Bailey Hall, Gorham Campus from 2-4pm.