USM Social Dashboard »

Check out our new Social Dashboard to see other ways to stay connected across the USM community.

Cutler Institute for Health and Social Policy

Population Health and Health Policy

School Ranking Re-Considered: Op-Ed article by Prashant Mittal

Posted May 23, 2013

"The formula for calculating recent high school grades is a classic example of mediocre mathematics," states Mittal, faculty member in the USM School of Business and senior statistician in the Cutler Institute for Health and Social Policy.

In the May 20th issue of the Portland Press Herald, Mittal highlights the problems with the current grading system and offers a better alternative: a statistically sound and robust algorithm to rank and grade high schools.

Why Do Some Critical Access Hospitals Close Their Skilled Nursing Facilities While Others

Abstract: 

Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) have long played an important role in the provision of Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF), swing bed, and other long term care (LTC) in rural communities and are more likely than other rural and urban hospitals to offer these services. The implementation of the Medicare SNF prospective payment system (PPS) in 1998 and subsequent exemption of CAH-based swing bed services from the SNF PPS in July, 2002 created financial incentives from CAHs to close their SNF units in favor of providing skilled level care using swing beds. During the period 2004 through 2007, 42 CAHs closed their SNF units. Despite the changing financial incentives related to the operation of SNF units by CAHs, 42% of CAHs (456) in 2010 continued to operate SNF units. Little is known about the reasons CAHs decide to close or retain their LTC services. This briefing paper and associated policy brief address this gap by examining the factors related to operation of skilled nursing services by CAHs, and specifically the factors related to closure of skilled nursing units by some CAHs and the continued provision of these services by others.

Key Findings:

  • Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) that closed Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) units cited a range of financial challenges related to payer mix, operating costs, cost allocation methods, and service utilization patterns.
  • The availability of alternative local long term care services, including swing beds, often contributed to hospitals’ decisions to close their SNF units.
  • CAHs that continued to operate SNF units were driven primarily by community need, despite the financial disincentive for doing so.
  • Hospitals reported substantial variation in their strategies for using swing beds for SNF, rehabilitation, and post-acute services.
  • Given ongoing concerns about financial viability and low census rates among some CAHs, further research on the ability of CAHs to expand patient services and revenues through swing bed use is warranted.
  • Additional research on the quality and outcomes of skilled care delivered by CAHs in SNF and swing beds is also recommended.

Suggested citation: Gale JA, Croll ZT, Coburn AF, et al.  Why Do Some Critical Access Hospitals Close Their Skilled Nursing Facilities While Others Retain Them?  Portland, ME: Flex Monitoring Team; December 2012.

Publish Date: 
12-30-2012
URL: 
http://flexmonitoring.org/documents/PolicyBrief31-CAh-SNF-services.pdf

Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC): Summary of pediatric quality measures for children enrolled in MaineCare FFY 2009 - FFY 2012

Abstract: 

This report, authored by USM Muskie School research staff, presents the results of the 16 CHIPRA Core Measures that were collected using MaineCare claims or Vital Statistics data and reported in the State of Maine’s FFY 2012 CHIP Annual Report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Also included in this report are an additional three measures from the Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC) project’s Master List of Pediatric Measures. In addition to presenting results in graphs and narrative, this report also provides measure definitions and background information about each measure topic.

The goal of this document is to present the claims- and vital statistics-based CHIPRA and IHOC measure results in a user-friendly format for IHOC project stakeholders. Measures are grouped by topic. For each topic, a Background section provides a brief description and rationale for collection. (The background discussion for CHIPRA Core Measures is drawn from the Background Report for the Initial, Recommended Core Set of Children’s Healthcare Quality Measures for Voluntary Use by Medicaid and CHIP Programs. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/chipra/corebackgrnd.htm) Next, we provide a general description of how each measure is defined, followed by the results.

Suggested citation: Anderson N, Meagher T. Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC): Summary of Pediatric Quality Measures for Children Enrolled in MaineCare FFY 2009 - FFY 2012.   Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; April 2013.

Publish Date: 
04-30-2013
Author: 
Project: 
URL: 
http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/oms/pdfs_doc/ihoc/Summary_of_Pediatric_Quality_Measures_2012.pdf

Rural Children Experience Different Rates of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract: 

Key Findings:

  • Among those with the highest levels of mental health need, rural children are more often identified with an ADHD diagnosis than urban children (24.7% vs. 19.8%; p<.05).
  • The higher prevalence of ADHD diagnosis and stimulant prescribing in rural areas likely results from a greater need for such treatment, based on scores from the Columbia Impairment Scale.
  • Among those with a possible mental health impairment, rural children are less likely to be diagnosed with a psychiatric illness other than ADHD and are less likely to receive counseling.
  • Higher rates of poverty, public coverage, and mental health impairment among rural children explain their greater likelihood of a mental health prescription and stimulant use.

Suggested citation: Anderson, N., Neuwirth, S., Lenardson, J.D., & Hartley, D. (2013, April). Rural children experience different rates of mental health diagnosis and treatment. (Research & Policy Brief). Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Maine Rural Health Research Center.

Publish Date: 
04-30-2013
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/MRHRC/Rural-Children-Mental-Health_PolicyBrief.pdf

Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC) First STEPS Phase I Initiative: Improving Immunizations for Children and Adolescents

Abstract: 

This report, co-authored by Kimberley Fox and Carolyn Gray, provides a final evaluation of the initial phase of First STEPS (Strengthening Together Early Preventive Services), a learning collaborative led by Maine Quality Counts to support 24 pediatric and family practices in improving their childhood immunization rates. The evaluation found that all participating practices had higher immunization rates after participating in First STEPS. On average, overall child immunization rates increased by 5.1% at 12 months and 7.1% at 15 months, and average immunization rates across practices increased significantly from 74.2% to 81.3%. Practices also reported significant improvement in the use of recommended office practices, including staff training, recall/reminder procedures, and the use of data/registries.

This work was conducted under a Cooperative Agreement between the Maine Department of Health and Human Services and the Muskie School of Public Service at the University of Southern Maine and is funded under grant CFDA 93.767 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) authorized by Section 401(d) of the Child Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA). These contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

Suggested citation: Fox K, Gray C. Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC) First STEPS Phase I Initiative: Improving Immunizations for Children and Adolescents. (Final Evaluation Report).  Portland, ME: University fof Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; March 2013.

Publish Date: 
03-29-2013
Project: 
URL: 
http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/oms/pdfs_doc/ihoc/first-steps-phase1-eval-report.pdf

Rural Center Research Staff Well-Represented at National Rural Health Association (NRHA) Annual Conference

Posted May 13, 2013

Louisville, KY, May 2013—Karen Pearson and Erika Ziller each presented findings from their research on The Evidence for Community Paramedicine in Rural  Areas and Rural Implementation and Impact of Medicaid.  John Gale gave two presentations on Rural Health Clinics (Identifying Relevant Quality Measures and Readiness for Practice Transformation) as well as on Critical Access Hospital Community Activities under Health Reform.  Zach Croll displayed his findings from the Critical Access Hospital Community Benefit project as part of the NRHA poster session.

Gale Publishes Article on Rural Vets and Health Care Issues

Posted May 1, 2013

In a special section on "Bringing Vets Home" in the May-June 2013 issue of Health Progress, John Gale, of the Maine Rural Health Research Center and co-author Hilda Heady, Senior Vice-President of Atlas Research, note the evolving population trends — the aging of rural veterans, the growing number of female veterans and rates of homelessness among veterans — which place significant demands on VA and rural delivery systems. Coordination among health care providers is essential to increasing the availability of services and expanding veteran outreach programs. Read the article: Rural Vets: Their Barriers, Problems, Needs. Health Progress, 94(3):49-52.

Global Budgets, Payment Reform and Single Payer: Understanding Vemont's Health Reform. (Health Policy Colloquium Brief)

Abstract: 

The Muskie School of Public Service hosted two health policy colloquia this April to promote informed discussion throughout the state regarding MaineCare coverage options under the ACA and the implications of Vermont’s move toward a single-payer system.The series, sponsored by the Muskie School Board of Visitors, offers community conversations in which experts from various disciplines and perspectives inform and engage the broader public to explore and debate critical policy issues. On April 22, community and sector leaders joined for Global Budgets, Payment Reform, and Single Payer: Understanding Vermont's Health Reform. Participants discussed Vermont's recent movie toward single payer health care and how the state is cutting costs and improving how health care is delivered, as well as the implications for Maine.

Anya Rader Wallack, chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, presented on ways in which the state is seeking to make heath care a public good, creating an integrated delivery system, and moving to a single system where access to health coverage is not linked to employment.

Read the brief authored by Trish Riley of the USM Muskie School.

Publish Date: 
04-22-2013
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/HealthPolicy/Health-Policy-Colloquium-Vermont-Reform.pdf

Trish Riley on Medicaid Expansion and Maine Taxpayers

Posted April 4, 2013

Trish Riley, Adjunct Professor at the Muskie School, writes in the Bangor Daily News (posted March 28, 2013), "the assertion that Maine taxpayers are being penalized [in the ACA Medicaid expansion] deserves scrutiny."  She notes that much of the expansion for MaineCare, Maine's Medicaid  program, was paid by the initiative Dirigo Health, not state general funds, and describes the federal funding that Maine was able to secure--"dollars that other states did not receive."   She will be facilitating a panel discussion on April 8th which will be examining MaineCare's coverage options under the ACA.

Examining MaineCare’s Coverage Options Under the Affordable Care Act

Abstract: 

This Brief was prepared by Erika Ziller and Trish Riley of the Muskie School of Public Service to inform an April 8, 2013 colloquium convened to explore options and implications of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for Maine.

Highlights: In addition to increased Medicaid funding, in January 2014, the ACA will provide federally subsidized health care coverage for individuals with incomes up to 400% for Medicaid in a state, coverage will be subsidized by federally funded tax credits through health insurance exchanges, now known as the “Marketplace.” Those under 100% FPL are not eligible for Marketplace subsidies but could be eligible for Medicaid, depending upon state decisions.

Even if Maine does not choose to cover all those newly eligible under the ACA, beginning in 2014, MaineCare must extend eligibility for children aging out of foster care until they are 26, regardless of income. An estimated 46,000 uninsured individuals, nearly all of whom will be adults without children, would be newly eligible for Medicaid should Maine decide to participate in the ACA optional Medicaid coverage.

If Maine chooses not to participate in the ACA optional Medicaid program, the 14,000 uninsured childless adults with incomes between 100% and 138% FPL referenced above would be eligible to participate in subsidized coverage through the federal Marketplace, although there is disagreement over the affordability of these plans for this group. The 32,000 uninsured childless adults with incomes below 100% FPL would be ineligible for any subsidy through the Marketplace.

Continued coverage for currently eligible populations in Maine is uncertain. Maine must comply with a significant number of ACA provisions related MaineCare. These new requirements must be in place in all states, whether or not states extend eligibility in the Medicaid program or operate a health insurance Marketplace.

Publish Date: 
03-20-2013
Author: 
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/HealthPolicy/Brief-Examining-MaineCares-Coverage-Options-Under-the-Affordable-Care-Act.pdf
Syndicate content