USM Social Dashboard »

Check out our new Social Dashboard to see other ways to stay connected across the USM community.

Children Served by MaineCare 2012: Survey Findings

Abstract: 

The purpose of the annual Survey of Children Served by MaineCare is to monitor the quality of services delivered by MaineCare, the State's Medicaid and CHIP program.  The 2012 survey examines the experiences of families with children. ages 0-17, who are enrolled in MaineCare using a standardized survey instrument (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems--CAHPS--4.0H Child Medicaid Health Plan Survey). MaineCare scores very favorably compared with national benchmarks on CAHPS measures of Getting Needed Care, Getting Care Quickly, and How Well the Child's Doctors Community, with ratings at or above the 75th percentile on all the composites and individual items.  Overall ratings of the child's personal doctor, ratings of the child's specialist, and ratings of all the child's health care are also among the highest nationally.  Areas for improvement included MaineCare customer service and care coordination.  Continued administration of the CAHPS 4.0H Child Medicaid Health Plan Survey is recommended for 2013 and beyond to allow for ongoing monitoring of patient experience with and computation of trend results of the MaineCare program as well as ensuring that the MaineCare program complies with federal CHIPRA measure reporting requirements.

Suggested citation: Anderson, N., Fox, K., Thayer, D., & Croll, Z. (2013, January). Children served by MaineCare, 2012: Survey findings. Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service.

Publish Date: 
01-01-2013
URL: 
http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/oms/pdfs_doc/ihoc/Maine-2012-MaineCare-Children-Survey.pdf

Why Do Some Critical Access Hospitals Close Their Skilled Nursing Facilities While Others

Abstract: 

Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) have long played an important role in the provision of Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF), swing bed, and other long term care (LTC) in rural communities and are more likely than other rural and urban hospitals to offer these services. The implementation of the Medicare SNF prospective payment system (PPS) in 1998 and subsequent exemption of CAH-based swing bed services from the SNF PPS in July, 2002 created financial incentives from CAHs to close their SNF units in favor of providing skilled level care using swing beds. During the period 2004 through 2007, 42 CAHs closed their SNF units. Despite the changing financial incentives related to the operation of SNF units by CAHs, 42% of CAHs (456) in 2010 continued to operate SNF units. Little is known about the reasons CAHs decide to close or retain their LTC services. This briefing paper and associated policy brief address this gap by examining the factors related to operation of skilled nursing services by CAHs, and specifically the factors related to closure of skilled nursing units by some CAHs and the continued provision of these services by others.

Key Findings:

  • Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) that closed Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) units cited a range of financial challenges related to payer mix, operating costs, cost allocation methods, and service utilization patterns.
  • The availability of alternative local long term care services, including swing beds, often contributed to hospitals’ decisions to close their SNF units.
  • CAHs that continued to operate SNF units were driven primarily by community need, despite the financial disincentive for doing so.
  • Hospitals reported substantial variation in their strategies for using swing beds for SNF, rehabilitation, and post-acute services.
  • Given ongoing concerns about financial viability and low census rates among some CAHs, further research on the ability of CAHs to expand patient services and revenues through swing bed use is warranted.
  • Additional research on the quality and outcomes of skilled care delivered by CAHs in SNF and swing beds is also recommended.

Suggested citation: Gale JA, Croll ZT, Coburn AF, et al.  Why Do Some Critical Access Hospitals Close Their Skilled Nursing Facilities While Others Retain Them?  Portland, ME: Flex Monitoring Team; December 2012.

Publish Date: 
12-30-2012
URL: 
http://flexmonitoring.org/documents/PolicyBrief31-CAh-SNF-services.pdf

Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC): Summary of pediatric quality measures for children enrolled in MaineCare FFY 2009 - FFY 2012

Abstract: 

This report, authored by USM Muskie School research staff, presents the results of the 16 CHIPRA Core Measures that were collected using MaineCare claims or Vital Statistics data and reported in the State of Maine’s FFY 2012 CHIP Annual Report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Also included in this report are an additional three measures from the Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC) project’s Master List of Pediatric Measures. In addition to presenting results in graphs and narrative, this report also provides measure definitions and background information about each measure topic.

The goal of this document is to present the claims- and vital statistics-based CHIPRA and IHOC measure results in a user-friendly format for IHOC project stakeholders. Measures are grouped by topic. For each topic, a Background section provides a brief description and rationale for collection. (The background discussion for CHIPRA Core Measures is drawn from the Background Report for the Initial, Recommended Core Set of Children’s Healthcare Quality Measures for Voluntary Use by Medicaid and CHIP Programs. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/chipra/corebackgrnd.htm) Next, we provide a general description of how each measure is defined, followed by the results.

Suggested citation: Anderson N, Meagher T. Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC): Summary of Pediatric Quality Measures for Children Enrolled in MaineCare FFY 2009 - FFY 2012.   Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; April 2013.

Publish Date: 
04-30-2013
Author: 
Project: 
URL: 
http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/oms/pdfs_doc/ihoc/Summary_of_Pediatric_Quality_Measures_2012.pdf

Rural Children Experience Different Rates of Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract: 

Key Findings:

  • Among those with the highest levels of mental health need, rural children are more often identified with an ADHD diagnosis than urban children (24.7% vs. 19.8%; p<.05).
  • The higher prevalence of ADHD diagnosis and stimulant prescribing in rural areas likely results from a greater need for such treatment, based on scores from the Columbia Impairment Scale.
  • Among those with a possible mental health impairment, rural children are less likely to be diagnosed with a psychiatric illness other than ADHD and are less likely to receive counseling.
  • Higher rates of poverty, public coverage, and mental health impairment among rural children explain their greater likelihood of a mental health prescription and stimulant use.

Suggested citation: Anderson, N., Neuwirth, S., Lenardson, J.D., & Hartley, D. (2013, April). Rural children experience different rates of mental health diagnosis and treatment. (Research & Policy Brief). Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Maine Rural Health Research Center.

Publish Date: 
04-30-2013
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/MRHRC/Rural-Children-Mental-Health_PolicyBrief.pdf

Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC) First STEPS Phase I Initiative: Improving Immunizations for Children and Adolescents

Abstract: 

This report, co-authored by Kimberley Fox and Carolyn Gray, provides a final evaluation of the initial phase of First STEPS (Strengthening Together Early Preventive Services), a learning collaborative led by Maine Quality Counts to support 24 pediatric and family practices in improving their childhood immunization rates. The evaluation found that all participating practices had higher immunization rates after participating in First STEPS. On average, overall child immunization rates increased by 5.1% at 12 months and 7.1% at 15 months, and average immunization rates across practices increased significantly from 74.2% to 81.3%. Practices also reported significant improvement in the use of recommended office practices, including staff training, recall/reminder procedures, and the use of data/registries.

This work was conducted under a Cooperative Agreement between the Maine Department of Health and Human Services and the Muskie School of Public Service at the University of Southern Maine and is funded under grant CFDA 93.767 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) authorized by Section 401(d) of the Child Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA). These contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

Suggested citation: Fox K, Gray C. Improving Health Outcomes for Children (IHOC) First STEPS Phase I Initiative: Improving Immunizations for Children and Adolescents. (Final Evaluation Report).  Portland, ME: University fof Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service; March 2013.

Publish Date: 
03-29-2013
Project: 
URL: 
http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/oms/pdfs_doc/ihoc/first-steps-phase1-eval-report.pdf

Global Budgets, Payment Reform and Single Payer: Understanding Vemont's Health Reform. (Health Policy Colloquium Brief)

Abstract: 

The Muskie School of Public Service hosted two health policy colloquia this April to promote informed discussion throughout the state regarding MaineCare coverage options under the ACA and the implications of Vermont’s move toward a single-payer system.The series, sponsored by the Muskie School Board of Visitors, offers community conversations in which experts from various disciplines and perspectives inform and engage the broader public to explore and debate critical policy issues. On April 22, community and sector leaders joined for Global Budgets, Payment Reform, and Single Payer: Understanding Vermont's Health Reform. Participants discussed Vermont's recent movie toward single payer health care and how the state is cutting costs and improving how health care is delivered, as well as the implications for Maine.

Anya Rader Wallack, chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, presented on ways in which the state is seeking to make heath care a public good, creating an integrated delivery system, and moving to a single system where access to health coverage is not linked to employment.

Read the brief authored by Trish Riley of the USM Muskie School.

Publish Date: 
04-22-2013
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/HealthPolicy/Health-Policy-Colloquium-Vermont-Reform.pdf

Children a Risk in the Child Welfare System: Collaborations to Promote School Readiness

Abstract: 

A study of collaboration among the child welfare, early intervention and preschool special education, and early care and education systems to promote the school readiness of children in the child welfare system, based on an analysis of data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing (NSCAW) and a case study in Colorado that included key stakeholder interviews and foster parent and caseworker surveys.

Publish Date: 
04-01-2009
Author: 
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/CAR-Final-Report.pdf

Rural Considerations in Establishing Network Adequacy Standards for Qualified Health Plans in State and Regional Health Insurance Exchanges

Abstract: 

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires Health Insurance Exchanges (HIEs) to specify network adequacy standards for the Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) they offer to consumers. This article, authored by research staff at the Maine Rural Health Research Center, USM Muskie School, examines rural issues surrounding network adequacy standards, and offers recommendations for crafting standards that optimize rural access.

The authors review ACA requirements for QHP network adequacy standards, considering Medicaid managed care and Medicare Advantage (MA) standards as models, and analyze the implications of stringent vs flexible access standards in terms of how choices might affect health plans' participation in rural markets and rural enrollees' access to care. The authors propose strategies for designing standards with the degree of flexibility most likely to benefit rural consumers, including adjusting standards according to degrees of rurality and rural utilization norms; counting midlevel clinicians toward fulfillment of patient-provider ratios; and allowing plans to ensure rural access through delivery system innovations such as telehealth.

Suggested Citation: Talbot, J. A., Coburn, A., Croll, Z. and Ziller, E. (2013), Rural Considerations in Establishing Network Adequacy Standards for Qualified Health Plans in State and Regional Health Insurance Exchanges. The Journal of Rural Health. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12012

Publish Date: 
02-22-2013
URL: 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12012/abstract

Federal Health Care Reform: An Overview [Policy Brief]

Abstract: 

This policy brief discusses three of the main components of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as "Obamacare".  These components are helath insurance coverage, delivery system improvement, and cost containment.  The policy brief highlights some of the provision of the law that have already been implemented and those where importnat implementation decisions will have to be made.  The brief is authored by Dr. Andrew Coburn, PhD, Professor of Public Health and Director of the Population Health and Health Policy program at the USM Muskie School, and was presented at the Maine Policy Leaders Academy Health Care Forum breakfast session, Feb. 26, 2013 at the Senator Inn in Augusta,sponsored by the Maine Health Access Foundation.

For more information, please direct questions and comments to andyc@usm.maine.edu

Publish Date: 
02-26-2013
Author: 
URL: 
http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/Publications/PHHP/Federal-Health-Care-Reform-Overview2013.pdf

Emergency Transfers of the Elderly to Critical Access Hospitals: Opportunities for Improving Patient Safety and Quality

Abstract: 

Research has shown that essential information is often missing during transfer of nursing facility residents to the ED, and communication problems between nursing facilities an EDs are one of the most cited barriers to providing quality patient care.  Tools, such as tranfer forms and checklists, that improve communication between settings of care help improve patient safety and quality of care. 

This Policy Brief includes an appendix of transfer forms from 11 organizations.

Key Findings:

  • Transfers to the hospital emergency department (ED) are common for many nursing facility (NF) residents, with over 25% experiencing at least one ED visit annually, and many encountering repeat visits.

  • Communication issues, including incomplete information during transfer, impact clinical care of the elderly NF resident transferred to the ED.

  • Several studies strongly recommend the use of standardized transfer forms as a way of improving communication, which ultimately improves patient safety and quality of care. However, standardized transfer forms, in and of themselves, are not sufficient to solve communication issues between the sites of care (NF, EMS, ED).

  • The establishment of ongoing relationships between hospital, EMS, and nursing facility staff help facilitate effective communication regarding patient needs during the transfer process and encourage the development of a systems approach to the transition of care.

Why are standardized transfer forms helpful?

For Nursing Facilities: they help facilitate accurate exchange of information, reduce potentially avoidable hospitalizations, and provide a record of the patient's condition upon return.

For Nursing Facility residents: they help to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of transfer and treatment and may help the resident avoid additional health complications and emotional trauma.

For EMS: they provide the needed information to treat the patient en route and facilitate an accurate and comprehensive handoff report to the hospital.

For Hospitals: they help facilitate effective assessment and treatment of the patient in the ED, minimizes time spent in the ED, and reduces unnecessary admissions.

For Policymakers: to help reduce costs associated with unnecessary hospitalizations and longer ED lengths of stay.

Suggested citation: Pearson KB, Coburn AF. Emergency Transfers of the Elderly From Nursing Facilities to Critical Access Hospitals: Opportunities for Improving Patient Safety and Quality. (Policy Brief #32).  Portland, ME: Flex Monitoring Team; January 2013.

For more information on this study, please contact Karen Pearson at karenp@usm.maine.edu

Publish Date: 
01-30-2013
URL: 
http://flexmonitoring.org/documents/PolicyBrief32-Transfer-Protocols-with-Appendix.pdf
Syndicate content