USM President Richard Pattenaude's remarks are filmed by a local camera crew
prospective students
current students
faculty and staff
alumni and friends
visitors and community
academic programs
research
athletics
About USM
usm home page

Workforce or Critical Thinkers?
Grant explores issues

Ann Dean, assistant professor of English and director of college writing, teamed up with Margie Fahey, assistant dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, to bring together faculty from USM and Southern Maine Technical College in a colloquium that explores if and how higher education can meet the dual goals of graduating productive workers and critical, engaged citizens.

Dean and Fahey won a $5000 Trustees' Award for the Advancement of Liberal Learning to support the colloquium, ''Critical Public and/or Educated Workforce?'' The grant was one of three Trustees' Awards granted in the UMaine System this year to support faculty projects promoting the goals of the Life, Work, and Citizenship in the 21st Century Initiative; the other two were for $3000 and $2000.

The project calls for one colloquium this semester, held Friday, September 13 at SMTC, with a follow-up one during spring semester.

Dean and Fahey, with the support of SMTC administrators, designed the colloquium to engage faculty from both schools in a discussion of whether a focus on employability prevents students and faculty from achieving the traditional goals of a liberal education. In other words, does an emphasis on developing career skills keep students from becoming critical thinkers by limiting time for the exploration of ideas and of world history and cultures? Another fundamental question addressed by the colloquium is how students perceive the purpose and value of their post-secondary educations as they move from one institution to the other or make choices between institutions.

USM students do move between institutions, as well as in and out of school as they balance education and work. ''Nearly 50 percent of USM's graduating seniors are transfer students,'' the grant authors state in their proposal, ''and a significant proportion of those students begin their college work at a local technical college.'' The authors also point out that USM and the technical colleges share some adjunct faculty, but heretofore, USM and SMTC have not addressed collaboratively the issues raised by this project. The colloquium has been endorsed by James Ortiz, president of SMTC.

Participants in the first colloquium session were asked to prepare by reading materials including student papers from both USM and SMTC, Glynda Hull's ''Hearing Other Voices: A Critical Assessment of Popular Views on Literacy and Work,'' from the Harvard Educational Review (1993), and a selection from Arthur Levine and Jeanette Cureton's ''When Hope and Fear Collide: A Portrait of Today's College Students'' (Jossey-Bass, 1998).

Both full-time and adjunct faculty from both institutions engaged in discussion during the two breakout sessions. The focus of the first was shared concerns of USM and SMTC: student preparation and common characteristics of students. The second portion, organizers said, was designed ''to get 'like discipline' faculty together to brainstorm future collaborative projects between the institutions.'' USM departments represented by faculty at the colloquium were Accounting, Engineering, Environmental Science and Policy, English, Linguistics, Mathematics, Sociology and Nursing.

Business and civic leaders were asked to serve on a panel preceding the faculty discussion to add an off-campus perspective. Panelists for the first colloquium meeting were Mike Wilson, director of the Education Center at the Portland Housing Authority; Mike McGovern, Town Manager of Cape Elizabeth; and James Quirk from Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield. They framed the discussion by presenting data and anecdotal evidence about the region's students, voters, activists, and workers, and gave their visions of the region's needs and the best responses to those needs.

Fahey and Dean said the overall goal was to improve communication between the two schools and lay the groundwork for improved articulation between them in terms of curriculum, advising, and placement. A further goal is for participants to develop their understanding of their own ideas, questions, and hypotheses about liberal learning, and use that work to enrich their scholarship and teaching.

>back to currents