





|
 |
Academic advising as a formalized process has been an integral part
of higher education for decades, emerging along with the elective system
at the turn of the century when students were no longer forced into proscribed
curricula, but instead were faced with discipline and course choices and,
ultimately, career decisions. The importance that institutions have placed
on the advising process has certainly varied over the years and has seemed
to coincide with institutional growth patterns. Thus, during the sixties
and seventies, when colleges and universities were experiencing phenomenal
growth, advising as a function was not considered as important as when
institutional growth slowed and schools became interested in the retention
of students as well as recruitment. From a retention perspective, good
academic advising is critical. Academic advising provides institutions
with the opportunity to personalize education and to engage students in
their own learning. Through advising, advisors help students to become
integrated into the academic and social fabric of the institution; this
integration has proven to contribute to student persistence and success
(Tinto, 1993). The influence that academic advising can have on student
retention can be most positive when those involved (both faculty and staff)
view it as a developmental process, rather than a technical one synonymous
with course registration.
>return to handbook
Two approaches to academic advising appear to be prominent in the literature.
Inherent in each is an assumption about the nature of students. The first
is a prescriptive approach that assumes that students are immature and
irresponsible. Prescriptive advising makes students peripheral, not integral,
to the educational planning process. The role of the advisor is not to
facilitate and guide decision making but, rather, to make decisions for
students. Developmental advising, on the other hand, assumes that students
are striving, responsible, and capable of self-direction and should be
integral, not peripheral, to educational planning (Gordon, 1988). Advising,
in this sense, is viewed as a partnership between the student and his or
her advisor, with the advisor's role being defined as facilitator and educator
rather than prescriber.
Formal definitions of developmental advising do exist. Winston, Miller,
Ender, Grites, et.al. (1984) define it as:
a systematic process based on a close student-advisor relationship
intended to aid students in achieving educational, career, and personal
goals through the utilization of the full range of institutional and community
resources. (p.19)
Crockett and Habley (1988) offer a more operational definition:
Academic advising is a developmental process which assists
students in the clarification of their life and career goals and in the
development of educational plans for the realization of these goals. It
is a decision-making process by which students realize their maximum educational
potential through communication and information exchanges with an advisor;
it is ongoing, multifaceted, and the responsibility of both students and
advisors. (p.9)
Developmental advising, as gleaned form these definitions, is a comprehensive
process. It is a multi-faceted, continuous process of clarification, evaluation,
and decision making that has the establishment of meaningful contact between
a student and his or her advisor as its first agenda. Establishing
a meaningful academic advising relationship between students and advisors
is one important way to help students achieve the academic and social integration
critical to improved retention (Frost, 1991).
As a process, developmental academic advising draws heavily upon student
and adult development theory. Most of these theories fall into one of four
basic categories: 1) psychosocial models, where the focus is on the individual
as he/she develops through a sequence of stages which define the life cycle,
2) cognitive models, where development is viewed as a sequence of
irreversible shifts in the process by which individuals perceive and reason
about their world, 3) maturity models, which synthesize the developmental
picture by focusing on the simultaneous development of thinking, valuing,
relating, and inquiring skills, or 4) typologies, which suggest that there
are persistent individual differences such as cognitive style or temperament
which interact with developments. (Gordon, 1988). Developmental advising
draws heavily from the pyschosocial models and, in particular, the one
developed by Chickering.
Because it specifically addresses the developmental importance of the
college years, Chickering's psychosocial model has particular relevance
to developmental tasks of college-age students. These are:
- *Developing Competence - increased skills in intellectual,
physical, and social competence lead to a sense of confidence that one
is capable of handling and mastering a range of tasks.
- Managing emotions - increasing awareness of one's feelings which
allows flexible control and expression.
- *Developing Autonomy - confronting a series of issues which ultimately
lead to the recognition of one's independence.
- Establishing Identity - integrating the many facets of one's experience
and negotiating a realistic and stable self-image.
- Freeing Interpersonal Relationships - increasing tolerance and acceptance
of differences between individuals and increasing capacity for mature
and intimate relationships.
- *Developing Purpose - assessing and clarifying interests, educational
and career options, and lifestyle preferences and integrating those factors
in setting coherent direction for one's life.
- Developing integrity - defining a set of values that guide one's
actions.
*Of particular relevance to developmental advising are Chickering's vectors
of : developing competence, developing autonomy,
and developing purpose. It is within these vectors that an advisor
can have the most impact. As Gordon (1988) comments:
The advisor can assist in developing a student's sense of competence
by helping to identify both strengths and weaknesses and by recommending
courses that stretch, but do not overextend those strengths, that address
but do not focus on weaknesses. In developing a student's sense of autonomy
an advisor must understand that it is the right of the student to make
decisions just as it is the responsibility of the student to live with
those decisions. And, in the development of purpose, the advisor must
assist the student in developing an awareness of what is involved in educational
and career decision making. Helping students set life goals and develop
action plans for implementation is, then, an important aspect of developmental
advising.
While Chickering's model is notably relevant to a traditional age student
body, the three vectors that have particular application to advising also
apply to adults and other nontraditional students.
>return to handbook
|
 |