
|
 |
"Academic Advising is a
guided process of sense-making, meaning-making, and
decision-making regarding educational, career,
and life goals." (Dr. Susan
Campbell; Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs)
Two approaches to academic advising appear to be prominent in
the literature. Inherent in each is an assumption about the
nature of students. The first is a prescriptive approach that
assumes that students are immature and irresponsible.
Prescriptive advising makes students peripheral, not integral,
to the educational planning process. The role of the advisor is
not to facilitate and guide decision making but, rather, to make
decisions for students. Developmental advising, on the other
hand, assumes that students are striving, responsible, and
capable of self-direction and should be integral, not
peripheral, to educational planning (Gordon, 1988). Advising, in
this sense, is viewed as a partnership between the student and
his or her advisor, with the advisor's role being defined as
facilitator and educator rather than prescriber.
Formal definitions of developmental advising do exist.
Winston, Miller, Ender, Grites, et.al. (1984) define it as:
a systematic process based on a close student-advisor
relationship intended to aid students in achieving
educational, career, and personal goals through the
utilization of the full range of institutional and community
resources. (p.19)
Crockett and Habley (1988) offer a more operational definition:
Academic advising is a developmental process which assists
students in the clarification of their life and career goals
and in the development of educational plans for the
realization of these goals. It is a decision-making process
by which students realize their maximum educational
potential through communication and information exchanges
with an advisor; it is ongoing, multifaceted, and the
responsibility of both students and advisors. (p.9)
Developmental advising, as gleaned form these definitions, is a
comprehensive process. It is a multi-faceted, continuous process
of clarification, evaluation, and decision making that has the
establishment of meaningful contact between a student and his or
her advisor as its first agenda. Establishing a meaningful
academic advising relationship between students and advisors is
one important way to help students achieve the academic and
social integration critical to improved retention (Frost, 1991).
As a process, developmental academic advising draws heavily upon
student and adult development theory. Most of these theories
fall into one of four basic categories: 1) psychosocial models,
where the focus is on the individual as he/she develops through
a sequence of stages which define the life cycle, 2) cognitive
models, where development is viewed as a sequence of
irreversible shifts in the process by which individuals perceive
and reason about their world, 3) maturity models, which
synthesize the developmental picture by focusing on the
simultaneous development of thinking, valuing, relating, and
inquiring skills, or 4) typologies, which suggest that there are
persistent individual differences such as cognitive style or
temperament which interact with developments. (Gordon, 1988).
Developmental advising draws heavily from the psychosocial
models and, in particular, the one developed by Chickering.
Because it specifically addresses the developmental
importance of the college years, Chickering's psychosocial model
has particular relevance to developmental tasks of college-age
students. These are:
- *Developing Competence - increased skills in
intellectual, physical, and social competence lead to a
sense of confidence that one is capable of handling and
mastering a range of tasks.
- Managing emotions - increasing awareness of one's
feelings which allows flexible control and expression.
- *Developing Autonomy - confronting a series of issues
which ultimately lead to the recognition of one's
independence.
- Establishing Identity - integrating the many facets of
one's experience and negotiating a realistic and stable
self-image.
- Freeing Interpersonal Relationships - increasing
tolerance and acceptance of differences between individuals
and increasing capacity for mature and intimate
relationships.
- *Developing Purpose - assessing and clarifying
interests, educational and career options, and lifestyle
preferences and integrating those factors in setting
coherent direction for one's life.
- Developing integrity - defining a set of values that
guide one's actions.
*Of particular relevance to developmental advising are
Chickering's vectors of : developing competence, developing
autonomy, and developing purpose. It is within these vectors
that an advisor can have the most impact. As Gordon (1988)
comments:
The advisor can assist in developing a student's sense of
competence by helping to identify both strengths and
weaknesses and by recommending courses that stretch, but do
not overextend those strengths, that address but do not
focus on weaknesses. In developing a student's sense of
autonomy an advisor must understand that it is the right of
the student to make decisions just as it is the
responsibility of the student to live with those decisions.
And, in the development of purpose, the advisor must assist
the student in developing an awareness of what is involved
in educational and career decision making. Helping students
set life goals and develop action plans for implementation
is, then, an important aspect of developmental advising.
While Chickering's model is notably relevant to a traditional
age student body, the three vectors that have particular
application to advising also apply to adults and other
nontraditional students.
|
 |